Context:
Recently, India’s Supreme Court issued a stern ultimatum to Meta Platforms Inc. and WhatsApp, warning that they must comply with Indian constitutional and statutory norms on privacy, competition, and data protection or consider exiting the country. The dispute arises from WhatsApp’s 2021 privacy policy update, which allowed extensive data sharing with Meta entities without meaningful user consent, raising concerns over both privacy and market dominance.
Legal and Regulatory Background:
-
-
- Right to Privacy:
- The Supreme Court reaffirmed that the right to privacy is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. It emphasised that citizens’ data cannot be treated as a commercial asset at the expense of constitutional rights. The Court stated that companies cannot “play with the right to privacy of citizens” and that meaningful consent, not a mere “take it or leave it” choice must underpin any data-sharing arrangements.
- The Supreme Court reaffirmed that the right to privacy is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. It emphasised that citizens’ data cannot be treated as a commercial asset at the expense of constitutional rights. The Court stated that companies cannot “play with the right to privacy of citizens” and that meaningful consent, not a mere “take it or leave it” choice must underpin any data-sharing arrangements.
- Competition Act, 2002 — Abuse of Dominance and Unfair Terms:
- In November 2024, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) found WhatsApp’s 2021 policy to be an abuse of dominant position under the Competition Act, 2002. Forcing users to accept broad data sharing without a genuine opt-out was deemed exploitative and unfair.
- The CCI imposed a ₹213.14 crore penalty and directed remedial measures, including prohibiting conditional access and requiring clearer opt-in/opt-out mechanisms. Meta and WhatsApp challenged this at the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), which partly stayed the data-sharing ban but upheld the monetary penalty. The matter then reached the Supreme Court. Thus supreme Court given ultimatum to meta platform for abiding privacy law of India or exit from India.
- In November 2024, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) found WhatsApp’s 2021 policy to be an abuse of dominant position under the Competition Act, 2002. Forcing users to accept broad data sharing without a genuine opt-out was deemed exploitative and unfair.
- Right to Privacy:
-
Broader Legal and Policy Implications:
-
-
- Constitutional Governance: Reinforces enforcement of fundamental rights in the digital domain.
- Competition and Digital Markets: Shows how competition law complements privacy law to check dominant platforms.
- Digital Sovereignty: Signals India’s insistence that foreign tech firms comply with local laws rather than impose global privacy regimes.
- Constitutional Governance: Reinforces enforcement of fundamental rights in the digital domain.
-
Conclusion:
The judicial ultimatum highlights India’s insistence that global technology firms respect privacy rights, competition law, and data protection standards. The outcome could reshape the regulatory landscape for multinational platforms, balancing innovation and investment with fundamental rights and consumer protection.
